• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Superiority Based Revision of Defeasible Theories

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Olivieri161628-Accepted.pdf (175.8Kb)
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    Governatori, Guido
    Olivieri, Francesco
    Scannapieco, Simone
    Cristani, Matteo
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Olivieri, Francesco
    Year published
    2010
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We propose a systematic investigation on how to modify a preference relation in a defeasible logic theory to change the conclusions of the theory itself. We argue that the approach we adopt is applicable to legal reasoning, where users, in general, cannot change facts and rules, but can propose their preferences about the relative strength of the rules. We provide a comprehensive study of the possible combinatorial cases and we identify and analyse the cases where the revision process is successful. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.We propose a systematic investigation on how to modify a preference relation in a defeasible logic theory to change the conclusions of the theory itself. We argue that the approach we adopt is applicable to legal reasoning, where users, in general, cannot change facts and rules, but can propose their preferences about the relative strength of the rules. We provide a comprehensive study of the possible combinatorial cases and we identify and analyse the cases where the revision process is successful. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science
    Volume
    6403
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16289-3_10
    Copyright Statement
    © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
    Subject
    Science & Technology
    Computer Science, Information Systems
    Computer Science, Software Engineering
    Computer Science, Theory & Methods
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/411975
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander