Evaluation of sample preparation methods for label-free quantitative profiling of salivary proteome

View/ Open
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Zhang, Xi
Sadowski, Pawel
Punyadeera, Chamindie
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Saliva has become one of the more attractive body fluids for protein biomarker discovery studies because of its ease of collection, non-invasiveness and multiple samples can be collected from an individual at a single time point. With the development of modern data acquisition strategies, such as Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical Mass Spectrometry (SWATH-MS), the quality of saliva sample preparation has become a crucial factor for a successful protein identification and quantification. Several sample preparation methods have been proposed, but there has been no systematic evaluation conducted to date that ...
View more >Saliva has become one of the more attractive body fluids for protein biomarker discovery studies because of its ease of collection, non-invasiveness and multiple samples can be collected from an individual at a single time point. With the development of modern data acquisition strategies, such as Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical Mass Spectrometry (SWATH-MS), the quality of saliva sample preparation has become a crucial factor for a successful protein identification and quantification. Several sample preparation methods have been proposed, but there has been no systematic evaluation conducted to date that compared each of these methods. We have therefore, performed an extensive assessment using technical and biological repeats to evaluate the number of protein IDs and repeatability of three most commonly used techniques, in-solution digestion, filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and in stage-tip (iST) digestion. We discovered that in the case of human saliva sample, FASP provided the highest number of proteins (human and microbial) identifiable from a pool saliva sample, and there were no significant differences in terms of repeatability among the three methods investigated.
View less >
View more >Saliva has become one of the more attractive body fluids for protein biomarker discovery studies because of its ease of collection, non-invasiveness and multiple samples can be collected from an individual at a single time point. With the development of modern data acquisition strategies, such as Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical Mass Spectrometry (SWATH-MS), the quality of saliva sample preparation has become a crucial factor for a successful protein identification and quantification. Several sample preparation methods have been proposed, but there has been no systematic evaluation conducted to date that compared each of these methods. We have therefore, performed an extensive assessment using technical and biological repeats to evaluate the number of protein IDs and repeatability of three most commonly used techniques, in-solution digestion, filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and in stage-tip (iST) digestion. We discovered that in the case of human saliva sample, FASP provided the highest number of proteins (human and microbial) identifiable from a pool saliva sample, and there were no significant differences in terms of repeatability among the three methods investigated.
View less >
Journal Title
Journal of Proteomics
Volume
210
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Subject
Biochemistry and cell biology
Plant biology
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Biochemical Research Methods
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
IDENTIFICATION