• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Indigenous Impact Assessment: A quiet revolution in EIA?

    View/Open
    Embargoed until: 2023-04-11
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    O'Faircheallaigh, Ciaran
    MacDonald, Alistair
    Griffith University Author(s)
    O'Faircheallaigh, Ciaran S.
    Year published
    2022
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This chapter evaluates the shortcomings of state-led EIA processes in addressing Indigenous interests and the need for Indigenous participation in assessing projects that affect Indigenous territories. It shows how these shortcomings can be addressed through Indigenous Impact Assessment (IIA), an important and emerging form of impact assessment. The control or influence that Indigenous groups have in IIA extends into scoping, who conducts the IA, how the IA is conducted, and control over IA findings. The chapter considers the wider benefits of IIA for proponents, the state, and the environment. The analysis concludes that ...
    View more >
    This chapter evaluates the shortcomings of state-led EIA processes in addressing Indigenous interests and the need for Indigenous participation in assessing projects that affect Indigenous territories. It shows how these shortcomings can be addressed through Indigenous Impact Assessment (IIA), an important and emerging form of impact assessment. The control or influence that Indigenous groups have in IIA extends into scoping, who conducts the IA, how the IA is conducted, and control over IA findings. The chapter considers the wider benefits of IIA for proponents, the state, and the environment. The analysis concludes that there is no ‘best practice’ for conducting IIA, reflecting the diversity of Indigenous peoples and contexts and the scope for innovation that IIA offers. The key issue is that in seeking to gain the most from IIA, Indigenous peoples face important choices, including whom to partner with, what methods and lenses of assessment to adopt, and where to focus their efforts given the limited availability of resources. IIA is likely to become more prevalent because it helps address structural power imbalances, gives expression to growing recognition of Indigenous rights, and reflects a greater willingness by state agencies and proponents to embrace collaborative EIA with Indigenous groups.
    View less >
    Book Title
    Routledge Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282492-14
    Copyright Statement
    © 2022 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Routledge Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment on 11 April 2022, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282492
    Subject
    Indigenous studies
    Land use and environmental planning
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/413342
    Collection
    • Book chapters

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander