Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuffley, David
dc.contributor.editorGilani, Noor
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T00:05:28Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T00:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/413549
dc.description.abstractAudio streaming giant Spotify is getting a crash course in the tension between free speech and the need to protect the public from harmful misinformation. The Swedish-founded platform, which has 400 million active users, has faced a hail of criticism over misinformation broadcast on its most popular podcast, the Joe Rogan Experience.en_US
dc.publisherThe Conversation Media Groupen_US
dc.publisher.placeMelbourne
dc.publisher.urihttps://theconversation.com/spotifys-response-to-rogan-gate-falls-short-of-its-ethical-and-editorial-obligations-176022en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Conversationen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchApplied computingen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4601en_US
dc.titleSpotify’s response to Rogan-gate falls short of its ethical and editorial obligationsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC2 - Articles (Other)en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTuffley, D, Spotify’s response to Rogan-gate falls short of its ethical and editorial obligations, 2022en_US
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.date.updated2022-03-27T23:55:56Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)en_US
gro.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2022. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this worken_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorTuffley, David J.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record