Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodman-Delahunty, Jane
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorMartschuk, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorCossins, Annie
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T02:00:26Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T02:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/413559
dc.publisherRoyal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuseen_US
dc.publisher.placeSydney, Australiaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/getattachment/79755c1f-a91b-4e18-90ef-b86486af2a40/Jury-Reasoning-Research-%E2%80%93-response-from-researcheren_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminal lawen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw and legal studiesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode480401en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode48en_US
dc.titleResponses to submissions to the Royal Commission’s Consultation Paper on Criminal Justice in relation to the Jury Reasoning Researchen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGoodman-Delahunty, J; Hodgson, N; Martschuk, N; Cossins, A, Responses to submissions to the Royal Commission’s Consultation Paper on Criminal Justice in relation to the Jury Reasoning Research, 2017en_US
dc.date.updated2022-03-24T23:56:26Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMartschuk, Natalie


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Reports
    Contains reports by Griffith authors published for government agencies, industry and other organisations.

Show simple item record