• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Reliability and validity of a measure of role functioning among people with psychiatric disabilities

    Author(s)
    Harris, Meredith
    Gladman, Beverley
    Hennessy, Nicole
    Lloyd, Chris
    Mowry, Bryan
    Waghorn, Geoff
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Lloyd, Chris A.
    Year published
    2011
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aim: The aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Socially Valued Role Classification Scale (SRCS), a domain-specific measure of role functioning designed for use with community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, face validity, consumer and clinician acceptability and utility were examined. Methods: Sixty community residents with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated in this study where the SRCS was administered by telephone. Results: Test-retest reliability showed good or very good agreement for subscale scores (intraclass ...
    View more >
    Aim: The aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Socially Valued Role Classification Scale (SRCS), a domain-specific measure of role functioning designed for use with community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, face validity, consumer and clinician acceptability and utility were examined. Methods: Sixty community residents with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated in this study where the SRCS was administered by telephone. Results: Test-retest reliability showed good or very good agreement for subscale scores (intraclass correlations (ICCs): 0.78-0.89) and for items capturing amount of participation in domain-specific activities (ICC: 0.67-1.00). Greater variation was observed for items capturing assistance required with activities (?: 0.40-0.75), and standard of activities performed (?: 0.43-1.00). Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to very good associations in the directions expected. Face validity, user acceptability and utility in telephone interviews were adequate. Conclusions: These findings add to previous psychometric evidence and support the continued development of the SRCS for use in community mental health settings. The SRCS has promising utility for occupational therapists involved in psychiatric rehabilitation outcome measurement.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
    Volume
    58
    Issue
    3
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00921.x
    Subject
    Clinical Sciences
    Public Health and Health Services
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/41625
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander