• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Why Alliances Entangle But Seldom Entrap States

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    73503_1.pdf (393.8Kb)
    Author(s)
    Kim, TongFi
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Kim, TongFi
    Year published
    2011
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper explains one of the central roles of alliance contracts, the prevention of undesirable military entanglement. The existing literature on alliances argues that entrapment is a major concern for potential and actual alliance partners, but it is difficult to point out clear cases of entrapment. I provide two answers to this puzzle: First, entrapment is a narrower concept than others have realized, and it is rarer than the literature suggests. Second, leaders anticipate entrapment and carefully design alliance agreements before and after states form alliances. I examine the second argument through case studies ...
    View more >
    This paper explains one of the central roles of alliance contracts, the prevention of undesirable military entanglement. The existing literature on alliances argues that entrapment is a major concern for potential and actual alliance partners, but it is difficult to point out clear cases of entrapment. I provide two answers to this puzzle: First, entrapment is a narrower concept than others have realized, and it is rarer than the literature suggests. Second, leaders anticipate entrapment and carefully design alliance agreements before and after states form alliances. I examine the second argument through case studies of US alliance agreements with South Korea, Japan, and Spain.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Security Studies
    Volume
    20
    Issue
    3
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.599201
    Copyright Statement
    © 2011 Taylor & Francis. This is an electronic version of an article published in Security Studies, Volume 20, Issue 3, 2011, pages 350-377. Security Studies is available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com with the open URL of your article.
    Subject
    International Relations
    Political Science
    History and Philosophy of Specific Fields
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/41644
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander