Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorProietti-Scifoni, Gitanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaly, Kathleenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:23:21Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2013-05-30T00:33:16Z
dc.identifier.issn10282580en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10282580.2011.589666en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/41834
dc.description.abstractAlthough New Zealand has been a pioneer in the development and expansion of restorative justice in the adult and youth criminal justice systems, it has taken a more cautious approach to using restorative justice in adult cases of gendered violence. We present interviews of 19 New Zealand Opinion Leaders on the appropriateness of restorative justice for partner, family, and sexual violence, and child sexual abuse (CSA). We found that three groups, rather than two, better describe the range of positions: these are the Supporters, Skeptics, and Contingent Thinkers. All viewed child sexual assault as least suitable for restorative justice, with relatively more support in cases of partner, family, and sexual violence. The Opinion Leaders' positions were shaped by their experiences with restorative justice, professional position, racial and ethnic identities, and views of the criminal justice system. The participants' views were complex and varied, and not easily contained in a simple 'for' or 'against' dichotomy.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent255180 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom269en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto290en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalContemporary Justice Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume14en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminology not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160299en_US
dc.titleGendered violence and restorative justice: the views of New Zealand Opinion Leadersen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governanceen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2011 Taylor & Francis. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version.en_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record