Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConsidine, Julieen_US
dc.contributor.authorShaban, Ramonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Jenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolzhauser, Kerrien_US
dc.contributor.authorAitken, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, MIcheleen_US
dc.contributor.authorFielding, Elaineen_US
dc.contributor.authorFitzGerald, Gerarden_US
dc.contributor.editorAnthony F. T. Brownen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:18:47Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-02-10T01:42:34Z
dc.identifier.issn17426731en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01461.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/42147
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza on the Australian emergency nursing and medicine workforce, specifically absenteeism and deployment. Methods: Data were collected using an online survey of 618 members of the three professional emergency medicine or emergency nursing colleges. Results: Despite significant increases in emergency demand during the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza, 56.6% of emergency nursing and medicine staff reported absenteeism of at least 1 day and only 8.5% of staff were redeployed. Staff illness with influenza-like illness was reported by 37% of respondents, and 87% of respondents who became ill were not tested for the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza. Of the respondents who became ill, 43% (n= 79) reported missing no days of work and only 8% of respondents (n= 14) reported being absent for more than 5 days. The mean number of days away from work was 3.73 (standard deviation = 3.63). Factors anecdotally associated with staff absenteeism (caregiver responsibilities, concern about personal illness, concern about exposing family members to illness, school closures, risk of quarantine, stress and increased workload) appeared to be of little or no relevance. Redeployment was reported by 8% of respondents and the majority of redeployment was for operational reasons. Conclusion: Future research related to absenteeism, redeployment during actual pandemic events is urgently needed. Workforce data collection should be an integral part of organizational pandemic planning.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asiaen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom615en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto623en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEmergency Medicine Australasiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume23en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111003en_US
dc.titlePandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza in Australia: Absenteeism and redeployment of emergency medicine and nursing staffen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record