• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Reports
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Reports
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Verifying the end use potable water savings from contemporary residential water supply schemes

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    73764_1.pdf (2.409Mb)
    Author(s)
    Stewart, Rodney
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    Year published
    2011
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Some Australian water businesses are implementing a range of alternative water supply schemes in an attempt to conserve centralised supplies of potable water. However, the justification of alternative schemes often relies on best guess potable water savings, alternative source demand values and cost components. Seeking a more rigorous assessment process, this study followed an evidence-based approach in accordance with Step 5 of the Australian integrated resource planning (IRP) framework, whereby scheme water consumption was monitored through end-use studies and costs were evaluated using actual cost and performance data. ...
    View more >
    Some Australian water businesses are implementing a range of alternative water supply schemes in an attempt to conserve centralised supplies of potable water. However, the justification of alternative schemes often relies on best guess potable water savings, alternative source demand values and cost components. Seeking a more rigorous assessment process, this study followed an evidence-based approach in accordance with Step 5 of the Australian integrated resource planning (IRP) framework, whereby scheme water consumption was monitored through end-use studies and costs were evaluated using actual cost and performance data. Such detailed evaluations can extract accurate total resource perspective unit costs ($/kL) of alternative water supply schemes and better inform decision-making.
    View less >
    Volume
    2011
    Issue
    #61
    Publisher URI
    http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20160615085001/http://archive.nwc.gov.au/library/waterlines/61
    Copyright Statement
    © 2011 Commonwealth of Australia. Published by the National Water Commission. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this report please refer to the National Water Commission website.
    Subject
    Water Resources Engineering
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/42271
    Collection
    • Reports

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander