Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Li-Meien_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, Cordiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jin-Dingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Lan-Pingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T14:27:58Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T14:27:58Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-02-14T04:06:41Z
dc.identifier.issn1366-8250en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/13668250.2011.599316en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/42541
dc.description.abstractBackground There is little information available related to the reproductive health of people with intellectual disability (ID). The aims of the present study are to describe caregiver attitudes and to examine determinants of gynaecological health for women with ID. Method We recruited 1152 caregivers (response rate = 71.87%) and analysed their responses to a mailed-out, self-administered, structured questionnaire. We divided attitudinal perceptions of reproductive health into 4 domains: menstruation, menopause, sex education, and preventive healthcare. Each domain in turn had 5 issues (questions), with scores of 1 to 4 given according to the level of agreement with each issue (low to high score: strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree). The total sum score for each domain was 5-20 (total score range: 20-80). Results The respondents' attitudinal mean score was 57.78 ᠴ.64 (range: 48-75). The multiple logistic regression model revealed that the factors of "workplace training in reproductive health" (OR = 1.793, 95% CI = 1.31-2.46), "felt satisfied with public reproductive health services for the client" (OR = 0.694, 95% CI = 0.53-0.92), and "scores of reproductive health knowledge" (OR = 1.735, 95% CI = 1.29-2.34) were significantly correlated with attitudinal score level toward gynaecological health for women with ID. Conclusions: The study highlights that service authorities should address health policy initiatives to continue providing workplace training in reproductive health, public reproductive health services. There is also a need for caregivers to increase their knowledge of reproductive health.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom149en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto155en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume36en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321214en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321212en_US
dc.titleCaregiver attitudes to gynaecological health of women with intellectual disabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record