Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorTransportation Research Boarden_US
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.editorTransportation Research Boarden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:27:41Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:27:41Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-02-16T05:35:02Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://amonline.trb.org/en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3141/2247-14en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/42795
dc.description.abstractCycle Centers have emerged as a new travel demand management (TDM) intervention in US and Australian cities in recent years. These large end-of-trip facilities for cyclists offer bicycle storage, changing rooms, lockers, showers, bicycle repair and other amenities, on a user-pays basis. Their effectiveness as a TDM measure is not known, which this research sought to rectify. Australia's first cycle center opened at King George Square in Brisbane's central business district (CBD) in 2008. Operated by the private sector, and marketed as cycle2city, the center provides storage for 420 bicycles. An evaluation framework was derived directly from the stated aims and objectives of its funders and its manager-operators. The research used a questionnaire of cycle2city members, conducted in April 2009, supplemented by interviews with funding agencies, the center's operators and members. Route maps collected information on trip distances and the routes members chose to ride. The results show who is using the center, the travel modes they have been attracted from, and the transport benefits. Most users are men in white collar jobs. The majority of members commenced commuter cycling on joining cycle2city, switching from transit and the private car. Congestion-reduction benefits were small. Disconcertingly, the facility is not generating enough revenues to meet operating costs some two years after opening. The findings have direct implications for transport policy in cities regarding the role and potential use of cycle centers for TDM purposes.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherTransportation Research Boarden_US
dc.publisher.placeWashington, DC. United Statesen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://amonline.trb.org/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameTransportation Research Board Annual Meetingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleTRB 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-01-23en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-01-27en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationWashington, DC. United Statesen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchTransport Planningen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode120506en_US
dc.titleAre Cycle Centers Effective Transport Interventions? Evaluating Brisbane’s King George Square Cycle Centeren_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.rights.copyrightSelf-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please refer to the conference link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author9s0 for more information.en_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record