Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalasubramaniam, Balaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOh, Erwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Marken_US
dc.contributor.editorProf. Hiroyuki Arakien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:08:29Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:08:29Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2014-01-22T22:38:00Z
dc.identifier.issn13449656en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/4296
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, it is reiterated that the Roscoe and Poorooshasb (1963) formulation of the stress strain behaviour of normally consolidated clays is indeed in a more generalized form which is easily amenable to incorporate deformations under various degrees of drainage and can be extended to include cyclic loading and time effects beyond the primary phase of deformation. Also, the formulation can be used for stress states below the state boundary surface to include lightly overconsolidated and heavily overconsolidated clays. Particularly, it is shown here that Cam Clay model of Roscoe et al. (1963) and Modified Cam Clay model of Roscoe and Burland (1968) as based on energy balance equations and the normality concept can be considered as the special cases of the original formulation of Roscoe and Poorooshasb (1963). In order to achieve this, all theories are presented in similar mathematical forms, adopting the same formulation of Roscoe and Poorooshasb (1963). Modified Cam Clay Model of Roscoe and Burland, and the Roscoe and Poorooshasb theory made identical predictions of the shape of the state boundary surface, the pore pressure development during undrained behaviour, and the volumetric strain in the drained tests for all types of applied stress paths. Also, Modified Cam Clay model was only successful in predicting the shear strains along radial stress paths. For non-radial stress paths, Modified Cam Clay model needed an additional set of constant deviator stress yield loci, and when such a set was incorporated, the prediction from Modified Cam Clay model was the same as the original prediction of Roscoe and Poorooshasb (1963).en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent609798 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInternational Association of Lowland Technologyen_US
dc.publisher.placeSaga, Japanen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.ilt.saga-u.ac.jp/ialt/lti/jnls/Abstract7-1-1.htmen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto11en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLowland Technology Internationalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume7en_US
dc.rights.retentionNen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode290805en_US
dc.titleThe application of normality rule and energy balance equations for normally consolidated claysen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Engineeringen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright remains with the authors 2005. The attached file is reproduced here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this monograph please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors.en_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record