Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarman, Benen_US
dc.contributor.authorLow Choy, Darrylen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:56:26Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:56:26Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-03-08T22:38:50Z
dc.identifier.issn0964-0568en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09640568.2010.526405en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/43456
dc.description.abstractCompetition for land between agriculture and urban uses is a global problem. Until recently, planners and policy makers have relied on regulatory 'command and control' planning approaches; however, there is growing interest in the use of market-based instruments to address natural resource management issues in complex and highly contested peri-urban environments. Tradable development rights are one type of market-based instrument. While tradable development rights have been used extensively in the United States, their application in Australia has been limited. Yet, in Australia, population growth and development in peri-urban areas is placing extensive pressure on natural resources and productive agricultural lands. These pressures are particularly acute in Australia's fastest growing metropolitan region, South East Queensland. By using a case study approach we explore stakeholder perspectives on the value of this tool to protect peri-urban landscape values. Whilst current planner and stakeholder perspectives suggest there is considerable support, there are substantial political, institutional, knowledge, resource and legislative barriers that need to be overcome before this tool can be a viable, realistic and acceptable option for land use planning in peri-urban regions such as South East Queensland.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeunited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom617en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto635en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Managementen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume54en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Science and Management not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode050299en_US
dc.titlePerspectives on tradable development rights for ecosystem service protection: lessons from an Australian peri-urban regionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record