Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanzett, Robert B
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Lewis
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Carl R
dc.contributor.authorGilman, Sean A
dc.contributor.authorLansing, Robert W
dc.contributor.authorSchwartzstein, Richard M
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:12:09Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:12:09Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.modified2012-03-09T05:28:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1073-449X
dc.identifier.doi10.1164/rccm.201101-0005OC
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/43492
dc.description.abstractRationale: Opioids are commonly used to relieve dyspnea, but clinical data are mixed and practice varies widely. Objectives: Evaluate the effect of morphine on dyspnea and ventilatory drive under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Methods: Six healthy volunteers received morphine (0.07 mg/kg) and placebo intravenously on separate days (randomized, blinded). We measured two responses to a CO2 stimulus: (1) perceptual response (breathing discomfort; described by subjects as "air hunger") induced by increasing partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during restricted ventilation, measured with a visual analog scale (range, "neutral" to "intolerable"); and (2) ventilatory response, measured in separate trials during unrestricted breathing. Measurements and Main Results: We determined the PetCO2 that produced a 60% breathing discomfort rating in each subject before morphine (median, 8.5 mm Hg above resting PetCO2). At the same PetCO2 after morphine administration, median breathing discomfort was reduced by 65% of its pretreatment value; P < 0.001. Ventilation fell 28% at the same PetCO2; P < 0.01. The effect of morphine on breathing discomfort was not significantly correlated with the effect on ventilatory response. Placebo had no effect. Conclusions: (1) A moderate morphine dose produced substantial relief of laboratory dyspnea, with a smaller reduction of ventilation. (2) In contrast to an earlier laboratory model of breathing effort, this laboratory model of air hunger established a highly significant treatment effect consistent in magnitude with clinical studies of opioids. Laboratory studies require fewer subjects and enable physiological measurements that are difficult to make in a clinical setting. Within-subject comparison of the response to carefully controlled laboratory stimuli can be an efficient means to optimize treatments before clinical trials.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAmerican Thoracic Society
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom920
dc.relation.ispartofpageto927
dc.relation.ispartofissue8
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
dc.relation.ispartofvolume184
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchRespiratory Diseases
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11
dc.titleUsing Laboratory Models to Test Treatment: Morphine Reduces Dyspnea and Hypercapnic Ventilatory Response
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.rights.copyrightSelf-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the authors for more information.
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorAdams, Lewis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record