Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMardiasmo, Diaswatien_US
dc.contributor.authorSampford, Charlesen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Barnes, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.editorJinji, Goa, Lee, Jay, Ni, Jun, Ma, Lin, & Mathew, Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:19:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.modified2012-03-12T05:42:44Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/43566
dc.description.abstractEfficient state asset management is crucial for governments as they facilitate the fulfillment of their public functions, which include the provision of essential services and other public administration support. In recent times economies internationally and particularly in South east Asia, have displayed increased recognition of the importance of efficiencies across state asset management law, policies and practice. This has been exemplified by a surge in notable instances of reform in state asset management. A prominent theme in this phenomenon is the consideration of governance principles within the re-conceptualization of state asset management law and related policy, with many countries recognizing variability in the quality of asset governance and opportunities for profit as being critical factors. This issue is very current in Indonesia where a major reform process in this area has been confirmed by the establishment of a new Directorate of State Asset Management. The incumbent Director-General of State Asset Management has confirmed a re-emphasis on adherence to governance principles within applicable state asset management law and policy reform. This paper reviews aspects of the challenge of reviewing and reforming Indonesian practice within state asset management law and policy specifically related to public housing, public buildings, parklands, and vacant land. A critical issue in beginning this review is how Indonesia currently conceptualizes the notion of asset governance and how this meaning is embodied in recent changes in law and policy and importantly in options for future change. This paper discusses the potential complexities uniquely Indonesian characteristics such as decentralisation and regional autonomy regime, political history, and bureaucratic cultureen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.wceam.com/previous-congresses/wceam-2010/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename5th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleProceedings of the 5th World Congress on Engineering Asset Managementen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2010-10-25en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2010-12-27en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbaneen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180199en_US
dc.titleThe exemplification of governance principles within state asset management laws and policies: the case of indonesiaen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE2 - Conference Publications (Non HERDC Eligible)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record