Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorDr Richard Newsham-West
dc.contributor.authorMilligan, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorWinch, S
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:33:36Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:33:36Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.modified2012-08-29T08:59:10Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/43869
dc.description.abstractEffective and inclusive end-of-life planning can improve care of the dying patient; reduce patient anxiety about death, and aid bereavement for surviving relatives. Clarity in end-of-life care may also reduce the distress felt by clinical staff through reducing unwanted or futile medical interventions that are a known source of moral distress particularly for nursing staff. Ensuring that patient wishes are heard, documented and effectively managed within healthcare organisations, therefore, has potential to deliver great benefits for patients, health care staff, and the overall organisational climate. In Queensland, the Advance Health Directive (AHD) is a legally binding document that enables people to document their end-of-life care wishes in the event that they lack capacity to make their wishes known. Typically, AHD's include patient instructions to health carers with respect to initiating/withholding resuscitation, artificial feeding and hydration, the administration of antibiotics, and the use of life sustaining measures such as ventilation at end-of-life. Directions documented in an AHD take precedence over the opinion of any other substitute decision maker, including an appointed guardian, a nominated EPOA, or Statutory Health Attorney. The AHD is, therefore, potentially a powerful legal document that can support patient autonomy at end-of- life, and reduce futile interventions. While the AHD is a significant legal document in the management of end-of-life care little is known about its actual prevalence, contents or management in the acute care hospital setting. This paper will present data from a study in which a retrospective chart audit of over 2500 charts in a Queensland tertiary referral hospital to determine the (previously unknown) prevalence and management of AHD's. In this paper, we examine potential reasons for the very low prevalence (0.5%) and high numbers of invalid documents found. We further explore why the AHD appears under-utilised as a means of supporting patient autonomy at end-of-life. Potential areas of organisational reform concerning the promotion, management and more effective use of EOL advance planning will also be addressed.
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGriffith University
dc.publisher.placeGold Coast
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/gold-coast-health-medical-research-2010
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename2010 Gold Coast Health and Medical Research Conference
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitle2010 Gold Coast Health and Medical Research Conference
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2010-12-02
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2010-12-03
dc.relation.ispartoflocationRadisson Resort, Gold Coast
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180199
dc.titleThe Prevalence and Use of Advance Health Directives (AHD’s) in Promoting Patient Autonomy at End-of Life
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conferences (Extract Paper)
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Medicine
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMilligan, Eleanor
gro.griffith.authorHamilton, Peter M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record