Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBisset, Leanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorOfford, Soniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCollins, N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:10:11Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:10:11Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-03-22T01:28:13Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/43898
dc.description.abstractPhysiotherapy management of tennis elbow typically incorporates a multimodal approach including application of a forearm brace. Good quality evidence comparing different braces in the management of tennis elbow is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate if a novel forearm brace (Go-Strap brace, Thermoskin驠could improve pain-free grip, pressure pain threshold and wrist angle during a gripping task in people with tennis elbow compared with a standard counterforce brace and control condition. A repeated measures, crossover, double-blinded randomised control design was used. Thirty-five participants with a clinical diagnosis of tennis elbow (mean age 47.8 (SD 8.5) years) were measured before and after the application of a Go-Strap brace, a counterforce brace and control condition in a randomised order, a minimum of 48 hours between sessions. There was a significant main effect for time, with both braces significantly improving grip (Mean difference (95% CI): Go-Strap 22 N (8 to 36), counterforce 22 N (9 to 35)) and pressure (Go-Strap 48 kPa (2 to 93), counterforce 59 kPa (16 to 102)) pre- to post-application. There was no significant change with the control condition for any outcome. There was no significant difference between treatments for any outcome (grip: p=0.363; pressure: p=0.480; wrist angle: p=0.203). In addition, wrist angle did not significantly change over time. These results indicate that while the application of a forearm brace has an immediate positive effect on grip and pressure pain in participants with tennis elbow, the type of brace does not preferentially influence these outcomes.en_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherAustralian Physiotherapy Associationen_US
dc.publisher.placeVictoria, Australiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAPA Physiotherapy Conferenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitlePhysiotherapy Conference 2011en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-10-27en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-10-30en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode119999en_US
dc.titleThe efficacy of a specific forearm brace (Go-Strap) compared to a standard counterforce brace in participants with tennis elbow.en_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conference Publications (Extract Paper)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record