Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorKerry Carringtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Melanieen_US
dc.contributor.editorJuan Taurien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T13:29:53Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T13:29:53Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-03-29T05:05:20Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://www.crimejusticeconference.com/index.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/44084
dc.description.abstractThe case of Gabe Watson, termed by the media 'The Honeymoon Killer', is well-known in Australia and the US. Watson, an American, was accused of the murder of his wife on their honeymoon while they were scuba-diving on the Great Barrier Reef. He was subsequently convicted of manslaughter, served 18 months in an Australian prison, and was deported to the US. Upon arrival in the US, Watson was extradited from California to Alabama, where he is awaiting trial on charges of murder and kidnapping. This paper will examine two potential serious human rights violations that the impending trial of Watson presents: ne bis in idem, and extra-territorial jurisdiction. While Australia avoided violating international law by deporting rather than extraditing Watson, the first concern is that the US state of Alabama is seeking to try Watson for conduct he was already convicted of by an Australian court. The second issue is whether a state of the USA has the jurisdiction to try one of their nationals for conduct committed in the territory of Australia. An analysis of this specific case and its charges will be presented in the context of the Australian, US, and international application of extra-territorial jurisdiction and the ne bis in idem principle.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherQueensland University of Technologyen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.crimejusticeconference.com/index.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameCrime, Justice and Social Democracy: An International Conferenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleCrime, Justice and Social Democracyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-09-26en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-09-28en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminal Law and Procedureen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Rights Lawen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180110en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180114en_US
dc.titleSociety is Entitled to But One Satisfaction: Ne bis in idem and jurisdiction questions in the Gabe Watson caseen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Criminology and Criminal Justiceen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record