Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeijzers, Gerben B
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Don
dc.contributor.authorHooper, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorBost, Nerolie
dc.contributor.authorCrilly, Julia
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Michael Craig
dc.contributor.authorEddington, Blake
dc.contributor.authorGeeraedts, Leo MG
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T01:30:50Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T01:30:50Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-011-1231-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/44690
dc.description.abstractBackground Initial management of trauma patients is focused on identifying life- and limb-threatening injuries and may lead to missed injuries. A tertiary survey can minimise the number and effect of missed injuries and involves a physical re-examination and review of all investigations within 24 h of admission. There is little information on current practice of tertiary survey performance in hospitals without a dedicated trauma service. We aimed to determine the rate of tertiary survey performance and the detail of documentation as well as the baseline rate of missed injuries. Methods We performed a retrospective, descriptive study of all multitrauma patients who presented to an Australian level II regional trauma centre without a dedicated trauma service between May 2008 and February 2009. A medical records review was conducted to determine tertiary survey performance and missed injury rate. Results Of 252 included trauma patients, 20% (n = 51) had a tertiary survey performed. A total of nine missed injuries were detected in eight patients (3.2%). Of the multiple components of the tertiary survey, most were poorly documented. Documentation was more comprehensive in the subgroup of patients who did have a formal tertiary survey. Conclusions Tertiary survey performance was poor, as indicated by low documentation rates. The baseline missed injury rate was comparable to previous that of retrospective studies, although in this study an underestimation of true missed injury rates is likely. Implementing a formal, institutional tertiary survey may lead to improved tertiary survey performance and documentation and therefore improved trauma care in hospitals without a dedicated trauma service.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom2341
dc.relation.ispartofpageto2347
dc.relation.ispartofissue10
dc.relation.ispartofjournalWorld Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofvolume35
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110399
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.titleTertiary Survey Performance in a Regional Trauma Hospital Without a Dedicated Trauma Service
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.date.issued2015-05-31T22:18:19Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCrilly, Julia
gro.griffith.authorKeijzers, Gerben


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record