• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Quality assurance of assessment through consensus moderation: A reporting framework for institutional engagement

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    74040_1.pdf (215.0Kb)
    Author(s)
    Nulty, Duncan
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Nulty, Duncan D.
    Year published
    2011
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment. The framework: 尲ovides a common basis for institutions to implement, monitor and improve practices that ensure the quality of student learning and its assessment; 奮sures that academic standards are embedded in the institutional activities academics and students experience throughout their teaching and learning. i.e as an integral, systemic and axiomatic outcome, not through corrective action after-the-fact; 奮dorses processes that place responsibility and authority for expert judgment about the quality of students' learning firmly with the academics ...
    View more >
    This paper proposes a framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment. The framework: 尲ovides a common basis for institutions to implement, monitor and improve practices that ensure the quality of student learning and its assessment; 奮sures that academic standards are embedded in the institutional activities academics and students experience throughout their teaching and learning. i.e as an integral, systemic and axiomatic outcome, not through corrective action after-the-fact; 奮dorses processes that place responsibility and authority for expert judgment about the quality of students' learning firmly with the academics who are the experts in their fields; 峵pports intra and inter-institutional collegial exchange, that places the achievement of informed consensus at the heart of a system that achieves quality; 實fers an approach to cross-institutional benchmarking of standards, and; 夥livers numerical metrics that respect institutional and disciplinary differences, and yet yield meaningful comparative data.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    Positive Futures for higher education; connections, communities and criticality
    Publisher URI
    http://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference2011/
    Copyright Statement
    © The Author(s) 2011. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author.
    Subject
    Education Assessment and Evaluation
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/45442
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander