Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWrigley, Williamen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmmerson, Stephenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:04:27Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:04:27Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-06-04T22:23:36Z
dc.identifier.issn03057356en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0305735611418552en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/45452
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated ways to improve the quality of music performance evaluation in an effort to address the accountability imperative in tertiary music education. An enhanced scientific methodology was employed incorporating ecological validity and using recognized qualitative methods involving grounded theory and quantitative methods involving confirmatory factor analyses. By distilling the disciplinary consensus, this approach enabled the specific definition of the constructs and standards used in university student classical music performance examinations, and provided their refinement with the empirical development of standards-based, criterion-specific rating scales for five instrument families. The study found that the examiners in each instrument family used between 15 to 17 constructs and associated descriptors, and at least two general dimensions referring to technical proficiency and another relating to musicality and interpretation. Analyses showed acceptable internal consistency and construct validity for the scales. Findings suggested that, although several construct and general dimension commonalities were found among the items across all scales, the presence of significant instrument-specific differences suggested that the use of generic rating scales may not provide sufficient content validity. Implications for the application of standards in music performance assessment were discussed.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom97en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto118en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsychology of Musicen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume41en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMusic Performanceen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode190407en_US
dc.titleEcological development and validation of a music performance rating scale for five instrument familiesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Education and Professional Studiesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record