Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorFrancois Smiten_US
dc.contributor.authorNulty, Duncanen_US
dc.contributor.editorFrancois Smiten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:51:48Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2013-05-22T23:28:35Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference2011/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/45475
dc.description.abstractConsensus moderation has been advocated as a mechanism by which universities can ensure the consistency and appropriateness of their academic standards. Unfortunately, for many academics, the term "consensus moderation" has no tangible meaning, while for others the term has only a narrow meaning. This is unhelpful when attempting to implement broader use of consensus moderation as a central component of academic quality assurance. This paper reports on research that maps the term "consensus moderation" to a time-line of eight levels of activity academics routinely engage in. Example practices are provided as a way to help people to realise that, in fact, many consensus moderation practices are already in common use - without those using them realising. Surfacing this realisation is a key component to reducing the "ad hoc" quality of some of these practices, systematising their use and thereby extracting more purposeful and deliberate benefit from them.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent161032 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSociety for Research in Higher Educationen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference2011/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameSRHE 2011en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleSociety for Research into Higher Education: Positive Futures for higher education; connections, communities and criticalityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-12-07en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-12-09en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationCeltic Manor Resort, Newport, Walesen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation Assessment and Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130303en_US
dc.titleWhat....? Consensus moderation? But, you're probably doing it already!en_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Griffith Institute of Higher Educationen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright remains with the author 2011. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author.en_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record