Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRickard, Claireen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:58:00Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-08-26T23:38:13Z
dc.identifier.doihttp://www.icpaq2011.com/abstract/1.aspen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/46547
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Peripheral intravenous venous catheters (IVCs) are used extensively throughout critical and acute care areas. These are traditionally recommended for routine removal at 72-96 hours in adults to prevent complications. This is not done for children, or for higher risk lines such as central venous catheters. A recent systematic review questions whether routine IVC replacement is effective. Methods: This multi-centre, open-label, randomised trial assigned patients to have IVCs removed only if clinically indicated, or routinely every third day. The primary outcome was phlebitis; secondary endpoints included bloodstream infections, infusion failure, catheters used, and hospital costs. Results: We studied 3283 patients with 5907 catheters. There was no significant between-group difference for phlebitis (clinical indication 13.08/1,000 catheter days, routine replacement 13.11/1,000 catheter days; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.77-1.31; P=0.96). There was no significant between-group difference for all-cause bloodstream infections (clinical indication 0.46/1,000 catheter days, routine replacement 1.23/1,000 catheter days; HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.08-1.23; P=0.08). The number of catheters per patient, and treatment costs (mean difference $7.58, 95%CI $4.74-$10.43) were significantly less for clinical indication patients. IVCs in the clinically indicated group were used for up to 23 days without complication. Conclusions: Patients do not benefit from routine removal; this merely increases patient discomfort, total catheter insertions and costs. It remains essential that IVCs are inserted and cared for aseptically, monitored closely and removed immediately if complications arise, or once treatment is complete.en_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherNo data provideden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.icpaq2011.com/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameInfection Control Practitioners Association of Queensland Conference (ICPAQ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleProceedings of theInfection Control Practitioners Association of Queensland Conferenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-10-12en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-10-14en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbaneen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111003en_US
dc.titleDoes Routine 3rd Daily Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Reduce Patient Complications?en_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conference Publications (Extract Paper)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record