Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrace, Debraen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Cass, Aronen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T12:55:14Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T12:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2009-09-25T04:45:15Z
dc.identifier.issn10610421en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/10610420510592581en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/4655
dc.description.abstractPurpose - This study seeks to examine the effects of three communication avenues, namely controlled communication (e.g. advertising/promotions), uncontrolled communications (word-of-mouth (WOM)/publicity), and brand name, on consumer service brand evaluation. Design/methodology/approach - This study employed a quantitative methodology and data were gathered from consumers intercepted in a shopping mall via a self-completed survey. Findings - The results show that controlled communications and brand name have a significant effect on customer satisfaction, brand attitudes and brand reuse intentions. WOM was shown to have a significant influence only on brand reuse intentions. In addition, comparisons made across different retail service types (e.g. stores and banks) showed differences in relationships between the examined variables. Research limitations/implications - The brand stimuli used in the survey instrument limit the findings to retail stores and banks and, thus, may not be applicable in all service situations. On this basis, it is recommended that future research should further explore the key constructs of this study in other service settings. Practical implications - The findings suggest that controlled communications and brand name are pivotal in establishing consumer expectations, thus influencing satisfaction and brand attitudes. Therefore, these types of advertising should be utilised to communicate realistic service experiences, while brand names should reinforce consumer confidence, trust and safety in usage. Positive WOM advocating proven reliability and consistency of the brand should be encouraged and rewarded to encourage new usage and reusage behaviour. Originality/value - The value of this paper lies in the comparison of different brand communications with different consumer responses to the brand not previously examined. The results therefore suggest ways in which marketers can maximise the benefits of their communications.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.publisher.placeBradford, Englanden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/1061-0421.htmen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom106en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto116en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Product & Brand Managementen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume14en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350204en_US
dc.titleExamining the effects of service brand communications on brand evaluationen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, Department of Marketingen_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record