Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorBerwyn Clayton
dc.contributor.authorChoy, Sarojni
dc.contributor.authorLidstone, John
dc.contributor.editorBerwyn Clayton
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:44:11Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:44:11Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.modified2012-08-28T08:46:02Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://avetra.org.au/publications/conference-archives/conference-archives-2011/2011-conference-papers
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/46565
dc.description.abstractA primary purpose of evaluating education and training courses is to assess how well their design and delivery aspects have met the predetermined learning objectives in order to make improvements. Thus traditional approaches to evaluation provide data on what is mainly of interest to the course designers and facilitators. Consequently, conventional data collection techniques do not necessarily seek in-depth self-reflection by the learners or what is of most significance to them. Hence the real impact of course completion is not fully understood. The Most Significant Change approach to evaluation is participatory and collects stories on the impact of the training experienced by the learners, supplementing data that provides a more holistic and richer picture of the learning outcomes from learners' perspectives. This paper reports on the use of the Most Significant Change technique to supplement data from conventional sources in order to evaluate a leadership capacity building course. Eighteen participants completed a Master of Education course over a period of two years. The Learning Experience Surveys provided mainly quantitative and some qualitative data on the students' experiences and satisfaction with teaching and learning. Stories about the most significant changes experienced by the students were recorded during interviews and confirmed at focus groups. The findings highlight the value in using the Most Significant Change as a tool for a more comprehensive evaluation of capacity building programs. Although the sample represents a group of university students, the tool offers potential for VET practitioners to extend their evaluation techniques and learn more about the impact of education and training that they offer.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent174483 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAVETRA
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.publisher.urihttps://avetra.org.au/pages/conference-archives-2011.html
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAustralian Vocational Education and Training Researchers Association
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitle14th Annual Conference of the Australian Vocational Education and Training Researchers Association
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-04-28
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-04-29
dc.relation.ispartoflocationMelbourne, Australia
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and Pedagogy not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130299
dc.titleMost significant change technique: a supplementary evaluation tool
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conferences
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Education and Professional Studies
gro.rights.copyright© 2011 AVETRA. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Use hypertext link for access to the publisher's website.
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorChoy, Sarojni C.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record