Systematic planning for river rehabilitation: integrating multiple ecological and economic objectives in complex decisions

View/ Open
Author(s)
Hermoso, Virgilio
Pantus, Francis
Olley, Jon
Linke, Simon
Mugodo, James
Lea, Patrick
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2012
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
1. Owing to intensive human use, freshwaters are among the most seriously threatened and modified environments on the planet. Their poor condition and the risk to services that humans need from these ecosystems make their rehabilitation a priority. However, many previous studies have reported the poor performance of many rehabilitation activities. 2. Here, we analyse reasons for this poor performance, focussing on the planning of rehabilitation activities, and propose a new approach. We argue that the failure to include driving factors at a scale adequate to capture the ecological processes involved, together with an ...
View more >1. Owing to intensive human use, freshwaters are among the most seriously threatened and modified environments on the planet. Their poor condition and the risk to services that humans need from these ecosystems make their rehabilitation a priority. However, many previous studies have reported the poor performance of many rehabilitation activities. 2. Here, we analyse reasons for this poor performance, focussing on the planning of rehabilitation activities, and propose a new approach. We argue that the failure to include driving factors at a scale adequate to capture the ecological processes involved, together with an insufficient incorporation of socio-economic aspects, is a key factor leading the poor performance of many rehabilitation activities. 3. We propose a new approach, 'systematic rehabilitation planning', that brings together advances made in conservation planning (cost-effectiveness analysis) and ecosystem science (understanding the complexity of ecosystem processes). This enables planning to be done at the catchment scale, and the trade-offs between various rehabilitation actions to be integrated and prioritised. 4. Finally, it is important, given the constraints imposed by a lack of knowledge, that the planning process is part of an adaptive cycle where it can benefit from and consolidate the experience gained during the implementation and monitoring stages.
View less >
View more >1. Owing to intensive human use, freshwaters are among the most seriously threatened and modified environments on the planet. Their poor condition and the risk to services that humans need from these ecosystems make their rehabilitation a priority. However, many previous studies have reported the poor performance of many rehabilitation activities. 2. Here, we analyse reasons for this poor performance, focussing on the planning of rehabilitation activities, and propose a new approach. We argue that the failure to include driving factors at a scale adequate to capture the ecological processes involved, together with an insufficient incorporation of socio-economic aspects, is a key factor leading the poor performance of many rehabilitation activities. 3. We propose a new approach, 'systematic rehabilitation planning', that brings together advances made in conservation planning (cost-effectiveness analysis) and ecosystem science (understanding the complexity of ecosystem processes). This enables planning to be done at the catchment scale, and the trade-offs between various rehabilitation actions to be integrated and prioritised. 4. Finally, it is important, given the constraints imposed by a lack of knowledge, that the planning process is part of an adaptive cycle where it can benefit from and consolidate the experience gained during the implementation and monitoring stages.
View less >
Journal Title
Freshwater Biology
Volume
57
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Systematic planning for river rehabilitation: integratingmultiple ecological and economic objectives in complexdecisions, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 57(1), 2012, pp. 1-9, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02693.x.
Subject
Environmental sciences
Environmental management not elsewhere classified
Biological sciences