Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorK. Vadera, Abhijeeten_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Aguilera, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Caza, Briannaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T13:43:14Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T13:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2013-06-13T04:23:38Z
dc.identifier.issn1052150Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/47267
dc.description.abstractDespite a significant increase in whistle-blowing practices in work organizations, we know little about what differentiates whistle-blowers from those who observe a wrongdoing but chose not to report it. In this review article, we first highlight the arenas in which research on whistle-blowing has produced inconsistent results and those in which the findings have been consistent. Second, we propose that the adoption of an identity approach will help clarify the inconsistent findings and extend prior work on individual-level motives behind whistle-blowing. Third, we argue that the integration of the whistle-blowing research with that on ethics programs will aid in systematically expanding our understanding of the situational antecedents of whistle-blowing. We conclude our review by discussing new theoretical and methodological arenas of research in the domain of whistle-blowing.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPhilosophy Documentation Centeren_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://secure.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/journal?openform&journal=pdc_beqen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom553en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto586en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBusiness Ethics Quarterlyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume19en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOrganisational Behaviouren_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode150311en_US
dc.titleMaking sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record