Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlberto, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBost, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChaboyer, Wendyen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFulbrook, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchmollgruber, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThorsteinsdóttir, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Geden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T17:34:41Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T17:34:41Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.modified2013-06-14T00:48:29Z
dc.identifier.issn00208132en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00926.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/47687
dc.description.abstractAim: The study aim was to profile the issues and activities of critical care nurses and professional critical care nursing organizations (CCNOs), and to identify expectations of the role of the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses. This information will determine how the critical care nursing specialty is changing over time and assist to formulate strategies that provide ongoing support to critical care nursing internationally. Background: This study is the third worldwide review of CCNOs. Two previous surveys were undertaken in 1999-2000 and in 2005. Data were collected from 23 and 51 countries, respectively. Methods: An online descriptive survey was e-mailed to 97 countries with CCNOs or known nursing leaders. Responses were analysed descriptively by geographical region. Results: Sixty-five respondents completed the questionnaire, achieving a 67% return rate. The most common issues identified were teamwork, access to educational programmes, formal practice guidelines/competencies, staffing levels and working conditions. Respondents perceived professional representation, national conferences, practice standards/guidelines, educational course standards, website provision, skills courses and educational workshops as the most important activities that should be provided by national CCNOs. Furthermore, less affluent countries showed greater emphasis on educational and training needs compared with wealthier counties and had poorer access to Internet and other supportive infrastructure. Conclusions: Teamwork, education, development of practice guidelines and workforce remain important issues to critical care nurses and have changed very little over the last 10 years, although the emphasis on teamwork is stronger than a decade ago. Differences in emphasis occur between affluent and less affluent countries and need to be acknowledged. Future research is recommended to better understand those priorities to enable the global community of critical care nurses to respond constructively.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom73en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto80en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Nursing Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume59en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111003en_US
dc.titleCritical care nursing organizations and activities: A third worldwide reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
gro.date.issued2012
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record