Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoy, Jennifer
dc.contributor.editorBuck, L. Frateur, G. Ion, W. McMahon, C. Baelus, C. De Granda, G. Verwulgen, S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:51:23Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.modified2014-04-02T04:16:32Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://iepde.org/epde12/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/51307
dc.description.abstractDesign education is in transition as content becomes driven by sustainable practice and, most recently, ideas emerging in relation to post-sustainable practice. Over the past two decades design courses around the world have been constantly reviewed and revised to create approaches to design thinking and practice that consider the broadest implications of design on environment and societies with the economic considerations dependent on meeting those imperatives. This has radicalised the content taught at a project level, for example with the introduction of product service systems, and at the level of specifics, such as in relation to material specification. As fundamental in educational terms, design graduate attributes have had to evolve as in order to apply new knowledge and understanding in professional practice graduates have to have a broader understanding of the drivers behind their decisions and become proactive in directing project briefs beyond traditional industry practice. To present a return brief based on sustainable design practices, or more radically to participate in design activism, demands that higher education provides students the opportunities to develop an understanding of the basis for design programs they are part of at a point in time and the leadership role they are expected to take. This involves design education inculcating the confidence through experience of presenting their work and opinion, based on comprehensive understanding of their design philosophy and sustainable practice, or post-sustainable practice strategies in action. This paper summarises the changes and highlights related issues of transferable skills, student recruitment and graduate attributes.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent4112878 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherDesign Society and the Institution of Engineering Designers
dc.publisher.placeBelgium
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.designsociety.org/publication/33216/creating_confidence_in_an_alienating_educational_environment
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameE & PDE 2012: Design Education for Future Wellbeing
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitle14th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education Proceedings
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2012-09-06
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2012-09-07
dc.relation.ispartoflocationAntwerp, Belgium
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchIndustrial and product design
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode330309
dc.titleCreating Confidence in an Alienating Educational Environment
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conferences
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Queensland College of Art
gro.rights.copyright© 2012 The Design Society. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the authors.
gro.date.issued2012
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorLoy, Jennifer


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record