Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorJan Wrighten_US
dc.contributor.authorDempster, Neilen_US
dc.contributor.authorFluckiger, Beven_US
dc.contributor.authorLovett, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.editorJan Wrighten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-17T12:00:33Z
dc.date.available2017-11-17T12:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.modified2013-07-03T05:00:48Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://aare-apera2012.com.au/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/52235
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to report on a small pilot study in which an heuristic was used to enable principals to reflect on the confidence they have in their existing leadership knowledge and how they might add to that knowledge in the future. The motivation for the study arose from a literature review of strategies for leadership development which showed up the lack of attention paid in research to principals' agency in the pursuit of their own learning. This contrasts starkly with the dominance in the literature of principals' reliance on education systems or authorities which, at present, make most decisions about principals' learning in leadership development programs. The piloting of the heuristic acts as a means of shifting the emphasis from system to self, thus empowering individuals to take more responsibility for their own future leadership learning needs. Method: Two versions of the heuristic were trialled; the first with 10 Australian and New Zealand principals. This led to a second version which was trialled with 6 newly appointed Australian faith-based independent primary school heads. The tool was administered electronically. It contained twenty statements arranged in groups of four around five focal points defining leadership learning content, namely, Pedagogy, People, Place, System and Self. This listing of focal points extended the original four found in Clarke's and Wildy's (2011) work (Pedagogy being the additional one). Data from the second version were processed and are presented for analysis and discussion in this paper. Results: Two types of results are presented and discussed. The first concerns the aggregated responses from the six participants. The second analyses participants' comments on a series of open-ended probes seeking reactions to the usefulness of the instrument itself. Conclusion: The findings from the pilot study confirm the usefulness of the content inventory arranged around the five focal points as an aid to principals' reflection. However, they point to further adjustments such as the inclusion of a confidence scale against which principals would be able to determine their own strengths and weaknesses and appropriate ways they might plan to extend those strengths and address those weaknesses. Overall, the results show that the heuristic is a helpful device in lifting personal agency for leadership learning.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent382095 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherAAREen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/6472/principals-reflecting-on-their-leadership-learning-with-an-heuristic-a-pilot-studyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAARE-APERA Conference 2012en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitle2012 joint International Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2012-12-02en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2012-12-06en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationSydney, Australiaen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducational Administration, Management and Leadershipen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130304en_US
dc.titlePrincipals reflecting on their leadership learning with an heuristic: a pilot studyen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Education and Professional Studiesen_US
gro.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2012. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the authors.en_US
gro.date.issued2012
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorDempster, Neil C.
gro.griffith.authorFluckiger, Bev
gro.griffith.authorLovett, Susan


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record