Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeng, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Bofuen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, K.en_US
dc.contributor.editorA.J. Franzluebbers, M. Kutilek, R. Lalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T15:50:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T15:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.modified2010-07-06T06:59:43Z
dc.identifier.issn01671987en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.still.2003.09.007en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/5262
dc.description.abstractSoil erodibility is thought of as the ease with which soil is detached by splash during rainfall or by surface flow. Soil erodibility is an important factor in determining the rate of soil loss. In the universal soil loss equation (USLE) and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE), soil erodibility is represented by an erodibility factor (K). The K factor was defined as the mean rate of soil loss per unit rainfall erosivity index from unit runoff plots. Although high rate of soil loss from the Loess Plateau in China is well known and widely documented, it is remarkable that there is little systematic attempt to develop and validate an erodibility index for soils on the Loess Plateu for erosion prediction. Field experimental data from four sites on the Loess Plateau were analyzed to determine the K factor for USLE/RUSLE and to compare with another erodibility index based on soil loss and runoff commonly used for the region. The data set consists of event erosivity index, runoff, and soil loss for 17 runoff plots with slope ranging from 8.7 to 60.1%. Results indicate that the K factor for USLE/RULSE is more appropriate for agricultural soils on the Loess Plateau than the erodibility index developed locally. Values of the K factor for loessial soils range from 0.0096 to 0.0269 t h/(MJ mm). The spatial distribution of the K value in the study area follows a simple pattern showing high values in areas with low clay content. For the four sites investigated, the K factor was significantly related to the clay content, (K=0.031-0.0013 Cl, r2=0.75), where Cl is the clay content in percent. The measured values of the K factor are systematically lower than the nomograph-based estimates by a factor of 3.3-8.4. This implies that use of the nomograph method to estimate soil erodibility would considerably over-predict the rate of soil loss, and local relationship between soil property and the K factor is required for soil erosion prediction for the region.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Science BVen_US
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/stillen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom157en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto165en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSoil & Tillage Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume76en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode260599en_US
dc.titleErodibility of agricultural soils on the Loess Plateau of Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2004
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record