Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorA.Tanhofer, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorI. P. Tanhoffer, Aldre
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorP. Hills, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorM. Davis, Glen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T16:00:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T16:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.modified2013-09-11T23:47:14Z
dc.identifier.issn20457723
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/53070
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare different methods of assessing energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity (PA) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) under community-dwelling conditions. Methods A reference standard encompassing the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique, heart rate monitoring (FLEX-HR), a multi-sensor armband (SenseWear Armband (SWA)), and two PA recall questionnaires were employed in 14 people with SCI to estimate EE and leisure-time PA. Results Mean total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) assessed by DLW, FLEX-HR, and SWA were 9817 ᠲ491 kJ/day, 8498 ᠱ516 kJ/day, and 11414 ᠳ242 kJ/day, respectively. Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) quantified by DLW was 2841 ᠱ626 kJ/day, 2935 ᠱ732 kJ/day estimated from FLEX-HR, and 2773 ᠲ966 kJ/day derived from SWA. After converting the PA recall questionnaire data to EE in kJ/day, PAEE for the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury (PARA-SCI) was 2339 ᠱ171 kJ/day and for Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) 749 ᠱ026 kJ/day. DLW-quantified PAEE was moderately associated with PARA-SCI (R 2 = 0.62, P < 0.05), but not with the other estimates of PAEE (R 2 ranged between 0.13 and 0.30, P > 0.05). Conclusion Our findings revealed that the PARA-SCI recall questionnaire was the best estimate of PAEE compared to the reference standard DLW approach. Although the between-method variability for SWA, FLEX-HR, and PASIPD-derived PAEE was small, there was a weak association between these methods and the criterion DLW technique. The best estimate of DLW-quantified TDEE was by FLEX-HR. SWA significantly overestimated TDEE in this population.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent330910 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherManey Publishing
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom35
dc.relation.ispartofpageto45
dc.relation.ispartofissue1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine
dc.relation.ispartofvolume35
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchExercise Physiology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Movement and Sports Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110602
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1106
dc.titleComparison of methods to assess energy expenditure and physical activity in people with spinal cord injury
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.rights.copyright© 2012 Maney Publishing. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
gro.date.issued2012
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorHills, Andrew


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record