Assessing single-leg squat quality: Kinematic predictors for experienced and inexperienced clinicians

View/ Open
Author(s)
Horan, Sean A
Weeks, Benjamin K
Year published
2012
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: The single-leg squat (SLS) is commonly used by physical therapists (PTs) in the clinical assessment of the lower limb. SLS performance is related to hip muscle function, knee loading patterns and risk of musculoskeletal injury. The kinematic parameters relating to clinician observations of SLS quality, however, are yet to be illuminated. Furthermore, it is unknown if such parameters are related to clinician experience. PURPOSE: To reveal the pelvis, hip and knee kinematic parameters used to determine SLS quality by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. METHODS: Eight student and eight post-graduate level ...
View more >BACKGROUND: The single-leg squat (SLS) is commonly used by physical therapists (PTs) in the clinical assessment of the lower limb. SLS performance is related to hip muscle function, knee loading patterns and risk of musculoskeletal injury. The kinematic parameters relating to clinician observations of SLS quality, however, are yet to be illuminated. Furthermore, it is unknown if such parameters are related to clinician experience. PURPOSE: To reveal the pelvis, hip and knee kinematic parameters used to determine SLS quality by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. METHODS: Eight student and eight post-graduate level musculoskeletal PTs agreed to rate each SLS. Twenty-two healthy, young adults (23.8 ± 3.1 years) were videotaped while performing three SLSs on each leg. 3D motion of the pelvis, hip and knee was recorded using a 10-camera optical motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford, UK). Quality of each SLS performance was rated from video data using a 10-point ordinal scale (i.e. 1 = lowest, 10 = highest). SLSs were rescored two weeks later by all assessors. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine kinematic predictors of stability scores for experienced PTs and student PTs. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was determined using a two-way mixed model to generate intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of consistency. RESULTS: The second SLS on each side was analysed for each participant, providing 44 SLSs for analysis. Experienced PT scores were greater than student PT scores (6.35 ±1.82 vs 6.05 ±1.45; p = 0.02). Variance in experienced PT scores was predicted by peak knee flexion, peak hip adduction, and knee mediolateral displacement (R2 = 0.64, p = 0.01). Variance in student PT scores was predicted by peak knee flexion, and knee mediolateral displacement (R2 = 0.57, p = 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was good for PTs (ICC = 0.71) and students (ICC = 0.60). Intra-rater reliability was excellent for PTs (ICC = 0.81) and good for PT students (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Experienced PTs and student PTs are both capable of reliable assessment of SLS stability; however experienced PT assessments bear somewhat stronger relationships to lower limb kinematics. PT ratings were related to hip and knee motion, while student PT ratings were specific to the knee.
View less >
View more >BACKGROUND: The single-leg squat (SLS) is commonly used by physical therapists (PTs) in the clinical assessment of the lower limb. SLS performance is related to hip muscle function, knee loading patterns and risk of musculoskeletal injury. The kinematic parameters relating to clinician observations of SLS quality, however, are yet to be illuminated. Furthermore, it is unknown if such parameters are related to clinician experience. PURPOSE: To reveal the pelvis, hip and knee kinematic parameters used to determine SLS quality by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. METHODS: Eight student and eight post-graduate level musculoskeletal PTs agreed to rate each SLS. Twenty-two healthy, young adults (23.8 ± 3.1 years) were videotaped while performing three SLSs on each leg. 3D motion of the pelvis, hip and knee was recorded using a 10-camera optical motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford, UK). Quality of each SLS performance was rated from video data using a 10-point ordinal scale (i.e. 1 = lowest, 10 = highest). SLSs were rescored two weeks later by all assessors. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine kinematic predictors of stability scores for experienced PTs and student PTs. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was determined using a two-way mixed model to generate intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of consistency. RESULTS: The second SLS on each side was analysed for each participant, providing 44 SLSs for analysis. Experienced PT scores were greater than student PT scores (6.35 ±1.82 vs 6.05 ±1.45; p = 0.02). Variance in experienced PT scores was predicted by peak knee flexion, peak hip adduction, and knee mediolateral displacement (R2 = 0.64, p = 0.01). Variance in student PT scores was predicted by peak knee flexion, and knee mediolateral displacement (R2 = 0.57, p = 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was good for PTs (ICC = 0.71) and students (ICC = 0.60). Intra-rater reliability was excellent for PTs (ICC = 0.81) and good for PT students (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Experienced PTs and student PTs are both capable of reliable assessment of SLS stability; however experienced PT assessments bear somewhat stronger relationships to lower limb kinematics. PT ratings were related to hip and knee motion, while student PT ratings were specific to the knee.
View less >
Conference Title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume
44
Copyright Statement
© 2012 American College of Sports Medicine. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the authors.
Subject
Biomechanics
Sports Medicine
Human Movement and Sports Sciences
Medical Physiology
Public Health and Health Services