Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarry, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorWailes, Nicken_US
dc.contributor.editorRon Callus, Russell Lansburyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T09:57:49Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T09:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.modified2007-03-18T21:42:06Z
dc.identifier.issn00221856en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/5363
dc.description.abstractSupporters of collective employment regulation in New Zealand would have celebrated a centenary of arbitration a full decade before Australia, in 1994. Yet fate intervened and New Zealand's arbitration system formally collapsed in 1991 following the introduction of the Employment Contracts Act. Despite a series of challenges during different periods, the Australian arbitration system has survived, if badly scathed, to see its 100-year anniversary. The present paper traces the historical similarities and differences in the advent, development and decline of the Australian and New Zealand systems of compulsory arbitration. Given the many structural similarities between the two systems, the paper explores important differences in the economic and political interests that both underlay the introduction and development of the two systems, and contributed to the earlier demise of the New Zealand system. The experience of the more extensive labour market reform in New Zealand provides some salutary lessons for those seeking further changes to weaken the Australian arbitration system.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asiaen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0022-1856.2004.00148.xen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom430en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto447en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Industrial Relationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume46en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350203en_US
dc.titleContrasting Systems? 100 years of arbitration in Australia and New Zealanden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, Dept of Employment Relations and Human Resourcesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at [www.blackwell-synergy.com.]en_AU
gro.date.issued2004
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record