A comparison of multi-objective optimisation metaheuristics on the 2D airfoil design problem

View/ Open
Author(s)
Mirjalili, S
Rawlins, T
Hettenhausen, J
Lewis, A
Year published
2012
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In this paper different variants of Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (MOPSO) algorithm are investigated, mainly focused on the swarm topology, to optimise the well-known 2D airfoil design problem. The topologies used are global best, local best, wheel, and Von Neumann. The results are compared to the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Multi-objective Tabu Search (MOTS) algorithm, and show that the attainment surfaces achieved by some of the MOPSO variants completely dominate that of NSGA-II. In general, the MOPSO algorithms significantly improve diversity of solutions compared to MOTS as well. ...
View more >In this paper different variants of Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (MOPSO) algorithm are investigated, mainly focused on the swarm topology, to optimise the well-known 2D airfoil design problem. The topologies used are global best, local best, wheel, and Von Neumann. The results are compared to the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Multi-objective Tabu Search (MOTS) algorithm, and show that the attainment surfaces achieved by some of the MOPSO variants completely dominate that of NSGA-II. In general, the MOPSO algorithms significantly improve diversity of solutions compared to MOTS as well. The MOPSO algorithm proves its ability to exploit promising solutions in the presence of a large number of infeasible solutions, making it well-suited to problems of this nature.
View less >
View more >In this paper different variants of Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (MOPSO) algorithm are investigated, mainly focused on the swarm topology, to optimise the well-known 2D airfoil design problem. The topologies used are global best, local best, wheel, and Von Neumann. The results are compared to the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Multi-objective Tabu Search (MOTS) algorithm, and show that the attainment surfaces achieved by some of the MOPSO variants completely dominate that of NSGA-II. In general, the MOPSO algorithms significantly improve diversity of solutions compared to MOTS as well. The MOPSO algorithm proves its ability to exploit promising solutions in the presence of a large number of infeasible solutions, making it well-suited to problems of this nature.
View less >
Journal Title
ANZIAM Journal
Volume
54
Copyright Statement
© 2013 Australian Mathematical Society. Published by Cambridge University Press. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Subject
Mathematical sciences
Optimisation
Engineering