Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurns, Kylie
dc.contributor.editorProfessor Harold Luntz
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T06:50:44Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T06:50:44Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.modified2007-03-18T21:39:26Z
dc.identifier.issn10385967en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/5482
dc.description.abstractNegligence cases in the High Court by nature present difficult policy choices and take place against the context of judicial recognition of the nature of Australian society, social values and human behaviour. Judges, inevitably, make assumptions and statements in their judgments about society and social values, the nature of the world, and human and institutional behaviour. This article refers to these statements as social facts. The article analyses the nature of the concept ‘social fact’, discusses the rules of evidence relating to the reception of social facts in the Australian High Court and presents a study of the use of social facts in High Court negligence cases in 2003. The study discusses the frequency of the use of social facts, the nature of social fact statements made, the source of social facts, the use of social scientific evidence and the use of social facts in Cattanach v Melchior. Overall the article argues that there is no coherent method in Australian law for determining reliable social facts and that this results in the adoption of conflicting and potentially inaccurate assumptions in the Australian High Court.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherLexis Nexis Butterworthsen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www2.lexisnexis.com.au/sites/en-au/products/torts-law-journal.pageen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom215en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto238en_US
dc.relation.ispartofedition2004en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalTorts Law Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume12en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode390117en_US
dc.titleThe way the world is: Social facts in High Court Negligence Casesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Lawen_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2004 Lexis Nexis Australia. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version.en_US
gro.date.issued2004
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorBurns, Kylie L.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record