Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBreakey, Hugh
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T12:31:37Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T12:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.modified2014-09-11T02:00:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0167-5249
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10982-013-9190-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/54926
dc.description.abstractNatural property rights are widely viewed as anathema to welfarist taxation, and are pictured as non-contextual, non-relational and resistant to regulation. Here, I argue that many of the major arguments for such views are flawed. Such arguments trade on an ambiguity in the term 'right' that makes it possible to conflate the core concept of a right with a situated or specified right from which one can read off people's actual legal entitlements and duties. I marshal several arguments demonstrating this conflation. In particular, I examine the right to free speech, where contextualization and responsiveness to the requirements of other rights are assumed as a matter of course. I conclude that the existence of one natural right does not foreclose the existence of other natural rights. Arguments for or against welfare rights must be assessed, at least to some extent, independently of the assertion of a natural property right.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent294903 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom573
dc.relation.ispartofpageto603
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLaw and Philosophy
dc.relation.ispartofvolume33
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEthical Theory
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPhilosophy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode220305
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode2203
dc.titleWho's afraid of property rights? Rights as core concepts, coherent, prima facie, situated and specified
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.rights.copyright© 2013 Springer Netherlands. This is an electronic version of an article published in Law and Philosophy, September 2014, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 573-603. Law and Philosophy is available online at: http://link.springer.com/ with the open URL of your article.
gro.date.issued2013
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorBreakey, Hugh E.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record