Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClough, Bonnie A
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Megan M
dc.contributor.authorAliyeva, Turana A
dc.contributor.authorMateo, Nino Jose
dc.contributor.authorZarean, Mostafa
dc.contributor.authorO'Donovan, Analise
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:05:57Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.modified2014-01-30T22:55:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1556-2646
dc.identifier.doi10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/56288
dc.description.abstractResearch ethics protocols relating to human participants were compared across five countries, namely, Australia, Azerbaijan, Iran, the Philippines, and South Africa. These countries were considered to be geographically and culturally diverse, as well as representing both developed and developing countries. The extent to which the research participant is protected across cultures and countries was investigated, with particular focus on the use of informed consent procedures. It was argued that current ethical guidelines and practices fail to ensure the protection of the most vulnerable participants within these cultures. Informed consent mechanisms also often fail to consider cultural differences in self-concept, understanding of research methods, and power differences between researchers and participants. Discussion of these ethical challenges and recommendations for research ethics development within these cultures and countries are discussed.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent1288731 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of California Press
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom2
dc.relation.ispartofpageto11
dc.relation.ispartofissue3
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
dc.relation.ispartofvolume8
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOther psychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchApplied ethics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode5299
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode5001
dc.titleProtocols for Protection of human Participants: A Comparison of Five Countries
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Applied Psychology
gro.rights.copyrightPublished as citation above. Copyright 2013 by the Regents of the University of California. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslinkcopyright on [Caliber (http://caliber.ucpress.net/)/ AnthroSource (http://www.anthrosource.net)] or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com
gro.date.issued2013
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorO'Donovan, Analise
gro.griffith.authorClough, Bonnie A.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record