Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArnautovska, Urska
dc.contributor.authorKolves, Kairi
dc.contributor.authorIde, Naoko
dc.contributor.authorDe Leo, Diego
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:04:41Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:04:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.modified2014-03-26T04:52:01Z
dc.identifier.issn0156-5788
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/AH12020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/57287
dc.description.abstractObjective Information regarding the availability of suicide-prevention programs in Australia is sparse and rather difficult to obtain. This study aimed to report and describe suicide and/or self-harm-prevention programs in Queensland. Methods Programs were classified by type of intervention, predominant type of program, setting of delivery and targeted population-at-risk. Results Sixty-six organisations were identified, providing a total of 101 suicide-prevention programs. The majority of programs operated at the prevention or treatment level, with less than half providing continuing (long-term) care. The programs targeted 12 different risk groups and were most frequently delivered within community settings. Conclusions The findings show a diverse distribution of activities across the levels of prevention and different risk populations. This survey demonstrates the existence of remarkable gaps in coverage and provision of programs for specific high-risk groups. What is known about the topic? Although suicide prevention in Australia has recently received considerable attention, there is currently no complete list or register of suicide-prevention programs. This reduces the opportunity for people at risk to access help, as well as agencies to link and build on existing models of service. What does this paper add? This study is unique in identifying and reviewing suicide-prevention programs that are funded by national or state suicide-prevention strategies, as well as those funded by private and community-based organisations. The identified programs are matched with the actual suicide risk of the targeted subpopulations, indicating a lack or overlap of programs for specific populations. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper is particularly relevant for policy makers as it identifies potential gaps in the provision of suicide-prevention programs for specific at-risk populations in Queensland. The relevance of the paper for practitioners, however, is in encouraging them to re-examine the provision of their services considering the entire continuum of suicide-prevention activities.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherC S I R O Publishing
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom660
dc.relation.ispartofpageto665
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian health review
dc.relation.ispartofvolume37
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth and community services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMental health services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420305
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420313
dc.titleReview of suicide-prevention programs in Queensland: state- and community-level activities
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Health, Australian Institute for Suicide Research & Prevention
gro.date.issued2013
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorDe Leo, Diego
gro.griffith.authorKolves, Kairi


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record