Chinese Lawmaking as a Communicative Act?
Author(s)
Cao, Deborah
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2003
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Chinese lawmaking, like many other things in China today, is changing. This paper discusses Chinese lawmaking and its recent changes to be followed by a semiotic interpretation of Chinese lawmaking in terms of communication process with a proposed constructive model of lawmaking. It argues that lawmaking is a communicative and interpretative act and a semiotic process. Meanings are built into legislation through interaction and communication and are also so constructed.Chinese lawmaking, like many other things in China today, is changing. This paper discusses Chinese lawmaking and its recent changes to be followed by a semiotic interpretation of Chinese lawmaking in terms of communication process with a proposed constructive model of lawmaking. It argues that lawmaking is a communicative and interpretative act and a semiotic process. Meanings are built into legislation through interaction and communication and are also so constructed.
View less >
View less >
Journal Title
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
Volume
16
Issue
3
Publisher URI
Subject
Law