Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBunn, SE
dc.contributor.authorDavies, PM
dc.contributor.authorWinning, M
dc.contributor.editorDr. Colin R. Townsend, Dr. Alan G. Hildrew
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:34:03Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:34:03Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.modified2009-12-03T06:06:39Z
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01031.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/6035
dc.description.abstract1. Many Australian inland rivers are characterised by vast floodplains with a network of anastomosing channels that interconnect only during unpredictable flooding. For much of the time, however, rivers are reduced to a string of disconnected and highly turbid waterholes. Given these features, we predicted that aquatic primary production would be light-limited and the riverine food web would be dependent on terrestrial carbon from floodplain exchanges and direct riparian inputs. 2. To test these predictions, we measured rates of benthic primary production and respiration and sampled primary sources of organic carbon and consumers for stable isotope analysis in several river waterholes at four locations in the Cooper Creek system in central Australia. 3. A conspicuous band of filamentous algae was observed along the shallow littoral zone of the larger waterholes. Despite the high turbidity, benthic gross primary production in this narrow zone was very high (1.7-3.6 g C m2 day1); about two orders of magnitude greater than that measured in the main channel. 4. Stable carbon isotope analysis confirmed that the band of algae was the major source of energy for aquatic consumers, ultimately supporting large populations of crustaceans and fish. Variation in the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures of consumers suggested that zooplankton was the other likely major source. 5. Existing ecosystem models of large rivers often emphasise the importance of longitudinal or lateral inputs of terrestrial organic matter as a source of organic carbon for aquatic consumers. Our data suggest that, despite the presence of large amounts of terrestrial carbon, there was no evidence of it being a significant contributor to the aquatic food web in this floodplain river system.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent63543 bytes
dc.format.extent380162 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0046-5070
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom619
dc.relation.ispartofpageto635
dc.relation.ispartofedition2003
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFreshwater Biology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume48
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode41
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode31
dc.titleSources of organic carbon supporting the food web of an arid zone floodplain river
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environment
gro.rights.copyright© 2003 Blackwell Publishing. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The definitive version is available at [www.blackwell-synergy.com.]
gro.date.issued2003
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorBunn, Stuart E.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record