Developing and promoting student discussion capacity in the classroom

View/ Open
Author(s)
Gregory, Sarah-Jane
Bridgstock, Martin
Clarke, Francis Michael
Year published
2013
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The art of conversing competently in scientific language that translates content into every day context is an important graduate skill that is not necessarily inherent but can be developed. Within our undergraduate programs there are a number of courses that implement modifications to the concept of Interteach (Saville & Zinn, 2005). The process requires students to prepare thoughts on discussion questions that integrate their scientific course knowledge with real world scenarios. The answers to these questions require synthesis and deduction. During class time students engage in a series of one-on-one discussions with ...
View more >The art of conversing competently in scientific language that translates content into every day context is an important graduate skill that is not necessarily inherent but can be developed. Within our undergraduate programs there are a number of courses that implement modifications to the concept of Interteach (Saville & Zinn, 2005). The process requires students to prepare thoughts on discussion questions that integrate their scientific course knowledge with real world scenarios. The answers to these questions require synthesis and deduction. During class time students engage in a series of one-on-one discussions with randomised peers. This process achieves numerous positive communication outcomes. It ensures students remain accountable for their learning in order to participate effectively, individual conversations prevents the ‘opt-out’ student from hiding in group dialogues, students are able to implement the ‘learning by peer teaching’ philosophy, students develop a greater sense of community by participating in peer conversations and students practice discussing concepts that require the use of scientifically appropriate language and terminology to align knowledge and application for deeper understanding. This process engages students in communication skill development in a safe and non-judgmental environment under essentially formative conditions.
View less >
View more >The art of conversing competently in scientific language that translates content into every day context is an important graduate skill that is not necessarily inherent but can be developed. Within our undergraduate programs there are a number of courses that implement modifications to the concept of Interteach (Saville & Zinn, 2005). The process requires students to prepare thoughts on discussion questions that integrate their scientific course knowledge with real world scenarios. The answers to these questions require synthesis and deduction. During class time students engage in a series of one-on-one discussions with randomised peers. This process achieves numerous positive communication outcomes. It ensures students remain accountable for their learning in order to participate effectively, individual conversations prevents the ‘opt-out’ student from hiding in group dialogues, students are able to implement the ‘learning by peer teaching’ philosophy, students develop a greater sense of community by participating in peer conversations and students practice discussing concepts that require the use of scientifically appropriate language and terminology to align knowledge and application for deeper understanding. This process engages students in communication skill development in a safe and non-judgmental environment under essentially formative conditions.
View less >
Conference Title
ComScIE 2013 Abstract and Biography Booklet
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2013. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the authors.
Subject
Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy