Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDennis, Garyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Roden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:10:56Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.issn01698141en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00026-Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/6181
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this experiment was to compare spinal loads during two-person lifting tasks performed with team members of matched versus unmatched standing height. Twelve young healthy male subjects performed matched and unmatched team lifts with two box masses (30 and 60 kg) and three initial box heights (0, 20 and 40 cm). All lifts were performed in the sagittal plane with a self-selected lifting technique from the initial box height to standing knuckle height. The box was instrumented with force transducers that measured horizontal and vertical hand forces, whilst sagittal plane segmental kinematics were determined using a video-based motion measurement system. Dynamic L4/L5 torques were calculated and used in a single equivalent extensor force model of the lumbar spine to estimate L4/L5 compression and shear forces. No significant differences were found in the maximum torque, compression or shear forces at L4/L5 between lifts performed with team members of matched or unmatched height. However, in the last part of the unmatched lifting condition the box was located closer to the short subject, which caused the reactive L4/L5 torque to decrease for short subjects and increase for tall subjects. Average (but not peak) L4/L5 torque and compression force were therefore significantly lower for short subjects and significantly higher for tall subjects in the unmatched compared to the matched lifting condition. However, the larger spinal load incurred by the tall subjects at the end of the unmatched compared to matched lifts are unlikely to drastically alter the risk of spinal injury caused by acute loading, since they were only one-third of the maximal spinal load that occurred during the lift and were below the NIOSH Action Limit. Despite this matching team member height may still be important for decreasing cumulative loading during repetitive lifting.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science BVen_US
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom25en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto38en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomicsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume32en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321402en_US
dc.titleSpinal loads during two-person team lifting: effect of matched versus unmatched standing heighten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2015-05-05T05:03:49Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record