Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO. Anderson, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilford, Todden_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Ross, Shelleyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:41:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2014-08-04T23:00:05Z
dc.identifier.isbn9781402084263en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/61834
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this book is to provide a synthesis of thought and practice in research in literacy and science education intended to lead to evidence-based results and generalizations that will serve as a foundation for public policy and informed curriculum, teaching, and assessment practices in education. The Gold Standard of educational research funding in the United States can be viewed as a response to the general dissatisfaction with the utility of educational research; this federal mandate fosters a shift of educational research toward positivist empirical research approaches, such as random controlled trials (RCTs). There is an expectation of greater generalization and policy relevance as Gold Standard research is conducted and reported. It should be noted this dissatisfaction is not confined to the United States. An international response to this dissatisfaction with educational research-systematic reviews of educational research such as the Campbell Collaboration (Campbell Collaboration, n.d.), the What Works Clearinghouse of the US Office of Education (US Institute of Education Sciences, n.d.), and the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) in the United Kingdom (EPPI-Centre, n.d.)- has also identified the general dearth of rigorous empirical research that can support meaningful generalization of research findings. The deliberations about qualitative-quantitative approaches to educational research over the last 25 years have established parallels for quantitative data considerations (reliability, validity, significance, objectivity) that consider dependability, credibility, believability, and confirmability of information (Howe & Eisenhart, 1990; Husen, 1988; Lather, 1992; Phillips, 2005; Pring, 2000). The enactment of these considerations has produced a diverse collection of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research in literacy and science education. Inspection of these research studies during the 2nd Island Conference revealed concerns about the clarity of constructs involved in the research, measurements of these constructs, interpretative frameworks and scoring rubrics, data scales (nominal, ordinal, internal, ratio), and statistical analyses of these data. Procedural rigor, clarity, mining and secondary analysis of existing databases and information resources, generalization of research results, research ethics, and mixed-methods and other innovative approaches were identified as issues to enhance research quality (see Yore & Boscolo, Chap. 2).en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofbooktitleQuality Research in Literacy and Science Education: International Perspectives and Gold Standardsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofchapter13en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom263en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto286en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode139999en_US
dc.titleMultilevel Modeling with HLM: Taking a Second Look at PISAen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.type.descriptionB1 - Book Chapters (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeB - Book Chaptersen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Book chapters
    Contains book chapters authored by Griffith authors.

Show simple item record