• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Is there an auditory-visual 'flash-lag' effect?

    Author(s)
    Hine, TJ
    White, AM
    Chappell, M
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Hine, Trevor J.
    Chappell, Mark
    White, Amanda MV.
    Year published
    2003
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A flash adjacent to the path of a moving object appears behind the moving object: the 'flash-lag effect'. We sought to test the flash-lag effect with a 'click' instead of a flash: a white triangle horizontally traversed the screen at a constant 12௳ passing through a fixation cross in the presence of a quiet click. The subject judged whether the click occurred before or after the triangle passed through the cross. To be perceived as co-instantaneous events, the click had to be presented 127 ms after the moving triangle reached the cross (a 'click-lead' effect, providing falsification of predictive accounts of the flash-lag ...
    View more >
    A flash adjacent to the path of a moving object appears behind the moving object: the 'flash-lag effect'. We sought to test the flash-lag effect with a 'click' instead of a flash: a white triangle horizontally traversed the screen at a constant 12௳ passing through a fixation cross in the presence of a quiet click. The subject judged whether the click occurred before or after the triangle passed through the cross. To be perceived as co-instantaneous events, the click had to be presented 127 ms after the moving triangle reached the cross (a 'click-lead' effect, providing falsification of predictive accounts of the flash-lag effect), as opposed to a standard flash-lag effect condition where a flashed triangle replaced the click and had to appear 60 ms before the moving triangle to appear aligned. With the auditory versus visual processing speed advantage considered, the neural time required to calculate a moving object's position is constant, independent of the modality of the flag.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
    Volume
    31
    Publisher URI
    http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00640.x
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00640.x
    Copyright Statement
    © 2003 Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at [www.blackwell-synergy.com.]
    Subject
    Clinical sciences
    Ophthalmology and optometry
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/6200
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander