Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuckett, Anthony Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Donald Edwinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-17T22:30:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-02T00:44:39Z
dc.date.available2017-03-02T00:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.modified2014-09-17T22:30:20Z
dc.identifier.issn0-9757710-2-7 Ien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5172/conu.16.3.240en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/62915
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the experience, rationale for and limitations of the group discussion as a method for collecting qualitative data. The researcher defines the group discussion as a 'focused group depth discussion' premised on a review of the focus group literature. A number of strengths are proposed for and the limitations are countered in the use of the group discussion as a method for collecting qualitative data.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.publishereContent Management Pty Ltden_US
dc.publisher.placeContemporary Nurseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom240en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto251en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalContemporary Nurseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume16en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth Promotionen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111712en_US
dc.titleCollecting qualitative data – Part 2: Group Discussion as a Method: Experience, Rationale and limitationsen_US
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionJournal Articles (Refereed Article)en_US
dc.type.codec1xen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health Facultyen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorStewart, Donald E.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record