• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Dialectics for IR: Hegel and the Dao

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    97885_1.pdf (235.6Kb)
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    Brincat, Shannon
    M Ling, L.
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Brincat, Shannon K.
    Year published
    2014
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This article performs a thought experiment. We ask: what if we were to engage two venerable legacies of dialectics, Hegelianism and Daoism, to see what results in terms of our thinking in International Relations (IR) about World Politics (WP)? Would some kind of a shift, synthesis, or transformation occur, as suggested by the dialectical goal of both traditions? Our discussion focuses broadly on the question of understanding social relations in world politics-the interconnectivity and complexity of social life and the potential for transformation it engenders-a question of increasing relevance for and in mainstream IR. We ...
    View more >
    This article performs a thought experiment. We ask: what if we were to engage two venerable legacies of dialectics, Hegelianism and Daoism, to see what results in terms of our thinking in International Relations (IR) about World Politics (WP)? Would some kind of a shift, synthesis, or transformation occur, as suggested by the dialectical goal of both traditions? Our discussion focuses broadly on the question of understanding social relations in world politics-the interconnectivity and complexity of social life and the potential for transformation it engenders-a question of increasing relevance for and in mainstream IR. We close by suggesting that aesthetics may offer a means for Hegelianism and Daoism to revitalize each other-a question to be pursued through further dialogue and research.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Globalizations
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.940246
    Copyright Statement
    © 2014 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Globalizations on 24 Jul 2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14747731.2014.940246
    Subject
    Aesthetics
    International Relations
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/63955
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander