Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChow, Lillyen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrazer, Lorelleen_US
dc.contributor.editorDavid Carson, Dr. Audrey Gilmoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:57:58Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.modified2009-09-25T04:45:50Z
dc.identifier.issn03090566en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/03090560310459104en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/6438
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses operational differences between mobile franchising arrangements and fixed-site franchises from an agency-theoretic perspective. Almost 40 per cent of all franchised units in Australia operate as mobile or home-based businesses, predominantly in service industries where products or services are provided directly to consumers. A two-stage methodology is reported in this paper, incorporating quantitative and qualitative research methods. In stage one, data obtained from a survey of the population of Australian franchisors in 1998 are analysed to compare operational variables of mobile and fixed-site franchise units. The second stage of the research employs in-depth interviews with a sample of mobile franchisors and franchisees to further explore relevant issues. The results confirm the agency theory perspective that start-up investment risk is lower in mobile units and mobile operations exhibit a higher level of repeat customers than fixed-site franchises. No significant differences between the two arrangements are revealed in relation to the levels of franchisee monitoring, initial training or essential franchisee experience. This study indicates that agency theory contributes to our understanding of mobile franchising arrangements, yet also suggests the findings are not completely explained by agency theory. The results imply that both monitoring and alignment of incentives have complimentary effects and that both forms of contract are necessary in a franchisor's control system.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htmen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom594en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto613en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3/4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEuropean Journal of Marketingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume37en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350204en_US
dc.titleServicing customers directly: Mobile franchising arrangements in Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2003
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record