Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaly, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.editorRichard Sparksen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:31:13Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:31:13Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.modified2007-05-22T22:15:45Z
dc.identifier.issn14624745en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/6547
dc.description.abstractAdvocates' claims about restorative justice contain four myths: (1) restorative justice is the opposite of retributive justice; (2) restorative justice uses indigenous justice practices and was the dominant form of pre-modern justice; (3) restorative justice is a 'care' (or feminine) response to crime in comparison to a 'justice' (or masculine) response; and (4) restorative justice can be expected to produce major changes in people. Drawing from research on conferencing in Australia and New Zealand, I show that the real story of restorative justice differs greatly from advocates' mythical true story. Despite what advocates say, there are connections between retribution and restoration (or reparation), restorative justice should not be considered a pre-modern and feminine justice, strong stories of repair and goodwill are uncommon, and the raw material for restorativeness between victims and offenders may be in short supply. Following Engel, myth refers to a true story; its truth deals with 'origins, with birth, with beginnings... with how something began to be' (1993: 791-2, emphasis in original). Origin stories, in turn, 'encode a set of oppositions' (1993: 822) such that when telling a true story, speakers transcend adversity. By comparing advocates' true story of restorative justice with the real story, I offer a critical and sympathetic reading of advocates' efforts to move the idea forward. I end by reflecting on whether the political future of restorative justice is better secured by telling the mythical true story or the real story.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent134204 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.publisher.placeLondon, UKen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://pun.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/4/1/55en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom55en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto79en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPunishment and Society: the international journal of penologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume4en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode390401en_US
dc.titleRestorative Justice: The Real Storyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Criminology and Criminal Justiceen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2002 Sage Publications. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. First published in Punishment and Society. This journal is available online: http://pun.sagepub.com/content/vol4/issue1/en_AU
gro.date.issued2002
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record